🚗 Dealers asked the FTC. The answer was... nothing

Good morning, Friend,

We’re hosting Pitch Tank at ASOTU CON again this year, and applications are now open!

Fill one out here, and bring your best pitch to Hanover, MD, this May to show dealers how you close the distance between them and their next lifelong customer relationship.

Keep Pushing Back,
—Chris with Paul, Kyle & Kristi

_{Reading time: 4 mins
First-time reader? Subscribe Here!}

If you were hoping today’s FTC + NADA webinar would bring clarity, you weren’t alone.

It didn’t.

The FTC joined NADA to talk through its recent wave of enforcement activity, including warning letters sent to 97 dealership groups and a headline-grabbing case that includes up to $75 million in consumer refunds and a $3.1 million penalty.

The expectation was simple: dealers had questions, and this was the moment to get answers.

That didn’t happen.

According to attendees, when NADA raised key issues, the FTC declined to go beyond what was already stated in its warning letters. FTC official Helen Clark acknowledged the questions, but offered no new guidance in response.

That leaves some of the biggest questions still sitting unanswered:

These are not edge cases. These are daily realities for dealers trying to advertise responsibly.

NADA pushed back, noting that recent consent orders go beyond what the law clearly requires and only apply to the specific dealers involved. That matters because right now, many stores are trying to interpret enforcement actions as if they are universal rules.

In the same place as before the webinar.

The FTC’s position is clear on one front: advertised prices need to reflect the real price a customer will pay, including all mandatory dealer-imposed fees, excluding only government charges like tax, title, and registration.

But how that applies across different states, pricing structures, and marketing channels is still not fully defined.

That uncertainty is the real issue.

Because this is not theoretical anymore. The FTC has already shown it is willing to act, and in a big way. Warning letters have gone out. Enforcement is active. And in at least one case, individual owners and managers were held personally liable.

The practical takeaway for dealers is not to wait for perfect clarity.
It is to move toward simplicity.

If a price cannot be achieved by the average buyer without conditions, it likely does not belong in the headline. If a fee is required, it likely needs to be in the price. If an offer depends on something specific, it needs to be obvious.

Not because the FTC explained it better today.
Because they didn’t.

--

Honda just said the quiet part out loud. After visiting a supplier factory in Shanghai, CEO Toshihiro Mibe reportedly came away saying, “We have no chance against this,” a blunt reaction to how quickly Chinese suppliers and automakers are developing vehicles and getting them to market. The bigger story is not just Honda. It is the pressure this puts on every legacy brand still trying to compete on speed, cost, software, and EV execution. Motor1 says Honda’s China sales fell from 1.62 million in 2020 to 640,000 in 2025, and the company is now moving engineers into a more independent development structure to speed things up.

For dealers, this is a useful reminder that product cadence is becoming part of the sales conversation. Shoppers may not ask about supplier ecosystems, but they do notice when one brand feels faster, fresher, and more responsive than another. This is also a good bridge into hybrids, value, and quality. Brands under pressure are going to work harder to shorten cycles, improve tech, and tighten pricing. That means buyers may see quicker updates and sharper positioning ahead.

The practical takeaway: customers are shopping in a market where speed is now a competitive edge, not just a factory metric.

--

Toyota has started selling U.S.-built Tundra and Highlander models in Japan through Toyota Mobility Tokyo, with wider rollout planned for summer 2026. The move uses a new certification system that took effect on February 16, letting certain U.S.-made vehicles be sold in Japan without extra Japan-specific testing. Toyota says the Tundra comes from Texas and the Highlander from Indiana.

That gives dealers a clean talking point: American-built is not a compromise. These vehicles are strong enough to be sold in Toyota’s home market, which says something about plant quality, product confidence, and the global appeal of trucks and family SUVs.

Lighter note: Toyota’s GR GT3 is also becoming a Japan-only McDonald’s Happy Meal toy starting April 10, a fun sign of how far performance branding can travel beyond the showroom.

--

A new proposal from the Alliance for Automotive Innovation would move road funding away from the gas tax and toward a fee based on vehicle weight. The push comes as fuel tax revenue keeps shrinking, with more hybrids and EVs using less or no gasoline while still putting wear on roads.

Heavier vehicles like full-size trucks, SUVs, and EVs could end up paying more under a system like this, since weight is closely tied to road impact. Nothing is finalized, but the timing is real. The current federal transportation funding law expires September 30, 2026, and lawmakers are under pressure to find a long-term solution.

For dealers, this is less about policy and more about positioning. Ownership cost conversations are expanding. It is no longer just fuel economy and insurance. Buyers, especially truck and EV shoppers, may start asking what future fees could look like and how different vehicle types stack up over time.